STRATEGIES FOR ENGAGING STUDENTS IN
Components of Nature of Technology
Characteristics of Technological Outcomes – Level 7 |
||
Supporting Learning Environment Level 7 To support students to develop understanding of characteristics of technological outcomes at level 7, teachers could:
|
||
Focused Learning |
Teaching Strategy |
Explanation |
Explain how malfunction can impact on the design and/or manufacture of similar and related technological outcomes |
Find examples of where malfunction has lead to subsequent enhancement / modification of the outcome and/or similar outcome. e.g. baby buggy. |
Give students an example of a badly designed outcome and a well designed outcome e.g. baby buggies and identify differences. |
Teacher sourced examples of ‘technological outcomes that have malfunctioned. |
Teacher led discussion about why these technological outcomes might have malfunctioned |
|
Justify how the design elements appear to have been prioritised in technological outcomes. |
Prioritisation of design elements |
Look at the ipod family and identify the design elements specific to each model and how the models differ in function. Which design elements were prioritised for each model and why. Source images of the ipod family. Devise a matrix that allows a clear comparison to be made/shown between the individual products. |
Justify the fitness for purpose of technological outcomes in terms of their physical and functional nature and socio-technological environment/s they are used within |
Students research a technological outcome that are familiar with have in order to justify it as being fit for purpose in terms of its physical and functional nature and socio-technological environment where it is used |
Students present justifications/ argument in a seminar presentation to the class |
Students research a technological outcome that are unfamiliar with have in order to justify it as being fit for purpose in terms of its physical and functional nature and socio-technological environment where it is used |
Students present justifications/ argument in a seminar presentation to the class |
|