STRATEGIES FOR ENGAGING STUDENTS IN
Components of Technological Practice
Outcome Development and Evaluation – Level 5 |
||
Supporting Learning Environment Level 5 To support students to undertake outcome development and evaluation at level five teachers could:
|
||
Focused Learning |
Teaching Strategy |
Explanation |
Generate design ideas that are informed by research and analysis of existing outcomes |
Analyse past students practice used in developing design ideas including their use of functional modelling. |
Use portfolios of previous students practice and/or Case Studies off the Techlink website. Focus analysis on how technological modelling was used to test the potential feasibility (fitness for purpose) of design ideas. |
Suggest additional design features and the attributes to extend an existing outcomes |
Insist that the additional design features and their attributes need to be informed by and enhance already existing attributes that the outcome possesses. |
|
Enhance student’s visual communication techniques. |
Teach students skills and techniques in visually communicating their design ideas using such things as:
|
|
Undertake functional modelling to develop design ideas into a conceptual design that addresses the specifications
|
Analyse past students practice used in developing technological outcomes. |
Use portfolios of previous students practice and/or Case Studies off the Techlink website |
Develop students functional modelling techniques to:
Have them identify the advantages and limitation of each technique. |
Look at models, mockups, testing and trialling techniques that allow the communication and testing of design ideas and conceptual designs
|
|
Enhance student skills in communicating design ideas and conceptual designs. |
Focus on introducing to students new skills and/or modes for communicating design ideas and conceptual designs including the use of:
|
|
Evaluate suitability of materials/components, based on their performance properties, to select those appropriate for use in the production of a feasible outcome |
Analyse Case Studies of others practice to identify how they have justified materials/components as being suitable for use in their technological outcome(s). |
Focus analysis on the research and testing that was undertaken to determine material/component suitability. |
Develop an attribute profile for the materials used in an existing product that is familiar to students e.g. chairs around the school |
Match material specifications to the specifications needed for the product to be fit for purpose. See: |
|
Have a practicing technologist explain how they determine the suitability of a material(s) for a specific function within a technological outcome. |
||
Produce and trial a prototype of the outcome |
Explore a variety of tools that can support the development and trialling of a prototype.
|
Explore tools such as:
|
Students analysis and compare existing products related to their concept design |
||
Analyse others practice to determine the nature of the overall practice they applied, and the technological modelling tools and techniques they used to test their prototype. |
Use exemplars of previous students work and/or Case Studies off the Techlink website. |
|
Supporting students with specialist knowledge and experience in constructing/manufacturing processes to realise a prototype. |
|
|
Trialling a prototype to demonstrate its potential to address the brief. |
Test the performance of the prototype in situ against the brief specifications to determine its fitness for purpose. |
|
Evaluate the fitness for purpose of the final outcome against the specifications. |
Analyse case studies of others practice to identify the tools and strategies they used to justify their outcome(s) as fit for purpose. |
Use exemplars of previous students work and/or Case Studies off the Techlink website and/or the work of a practicing technologist |
Dragons Den presentation. |
Students present their prototype and justifications as to why it is fit for purpose – others evaluate if the justifications provided are convincing or not |
|
Student present their prototypes and findings from trialling using written evaluations, powerpoint and/or a video presentation |
Presentation of prototype to an audience for evaluative feedback. |
|